Buy Two Get FREE Shipping

CODE: BUY2FREESHIPPING

Neutricks Research Center

Neutricks® research has been conducted with academic laboratories, and other research institutions such as CanCog Technologies, a leader in cognitive research.

Questions on Neutricks safety?
Call: 608-212-2142
Email: info@neutricks.com

Safety assesment of Apoaequorin

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.The main ingredient in Prevagen, apoaequorin, was evaluated for safety using a toxicity study, a common method for evaluating dietary supplements. Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

View study

Peer Reviewed Veterinary Journal Article

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.A novel mechanism for congitive enhancement in aged dogs with the use of a calcium-buffering protein. View study Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

View study

Neutricks Presented at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.Neutricks® was introduced to the world’s leading Alzheimer’s researchers in July, 2011 at the annual Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (AAIC) in Paris. Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

View study

Enhancement of Cognitive Function in Aged Canines

Want create site? Find Free WordPress Themes and plugins.Cognitive dysfunction syndrome (CDS) is a neurobehavioral syndrome affecting aged canines. This condition, once called senile old dog syndrome, is similar to Alzheimer’s disease Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.

View study

Research Center

Figure 1. Baseline Performance on the DNMP. Each animal was given 30 trials at each delay over 5 baseline sessions. The y-axis indicates total correct responses at each delay.

Figure 2. Effect of Apoaequorin on two different measures of performance on the discrimination learning task. The top shows the effect on errors to criterion measure of learning. The bottom shows percent correct for each of the groups.

Figure 3. Performance on the attention task as a function of number of distractors. The data reflect combined data from all three groups.

Figure 4. Performance on the attention task as a function of number of distractors and treatment condition.

Figure 5. Latency as a function of treatment and number of distractors, independently of response accuracy.

Figure 6. Baseline Performance on the DNMP. Each animal was given 30 trials at each delay over 5 baseline sessions. The y-axis indicates total correct responses at each delay.

Figure 7. Accuracy as a function of delay at baseline and when retested in the treatment phase. The data shown are the combined data for all of the groups.

Figure 8. Percent correct on DNMP under baseline and test conditions as function of treatment. The percent correct score was calculated by combining performance at all delays.